Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1078Hits:19486122Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID137954
Title ProperExplaining governance of the judiciary in Central and Eastern Europe
Other Title Informationexternal incentives, transnational elites and parliamentary inaction
LanguageENG
AuthorParau, Cristina E
Summary / Abstract (Note)What made democratic politicians in Central and Eastern Europe exclude themselves from governance of the judiciary? Institutional change in the judiciary is investigated through a diachronic study of the Romanian judiciary which reveals a complex causal nexus. The classical model of the ‘external incentives’ of EU accession, while explaining a general drive toward revision, played an otherwise marginal role. An institutional template prevailed, promoted by an elite transnational community of legal professionals whose entrepreneurs steering the revision of governance of the judiciary after 1989. The parliamentarians, disempowered by this revision, offered no resistance—a ‘veto-player dormancy’ that stands revealed as preconditional to such transnational influences.
`In' analytical NoteEurope-Asia Studies Vol. 67, No.3; May 2015: p.409-442
Journal SourceEurope-Asia Studies Vol: 67 No 3
Key WordsCentral Europe ;  Eastern Europe ;  Governance ;  Judiciary ;  Transnational Community ;  Transnational Elites ;  Parliamentary Inaction ;  Democratic Politicians ;  Veto - Player Dormancy


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text