Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1001Hits:19621966Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID138261
Title ProperLost in translation? how project actors shape REDD+ policy and outcomes in Cambodia
LanguageENG
AuthorPasgaard, Maya
Summary / Abstract (Note)Forest protection policies to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) are currently being implemented by international donors, governments and conservation agencies across the developing world aiming for reduction of greenhouse gases while ensuring fair distribution of benefits. This paper draws on a case study in northern Cambodia to analyse how conservation practitioners and the local forest management committees engaged in implementing REDD+ actively translate and influence the policy and its implementation in accordance with their respective interests through particular communication strategies. When assessing project progress and outcomes, the conservation practitioners involved in implementing projects show an interest in emphasising positive project assessments by downplaying potential project complications, and by primarily communicating with pro-REDD+ members of the local communities. Powerful actors in the local forest management committees adopt the conservation rhetoric of these practitioners; at the same time, they can interpret and control local access to resources to their own advantage. By doing so, they can ensure continued support, while not necessarily representing all community members or sharing benefits equally. The processes and consequences of this policy translation in a REDD+ arena are discussed and compared with existing dominant trends in environment and development policies.
`In' analytical NoteAsia Pacific Viewpoint Vol. 56, No.1; Apr 2015: p.111-127
Journal SourceAsia Pacific Viewpoint 2015-04 56, 1
Key WordsCambodia ;  Translation ;  REDD+ ;  Policy Actors ;  Pro - Poor Policy ;  Social Assessments