| ID | 138284 |
| Title Proper | NORAD does not need saving |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Jockel, Joseph T ; Sokolsky, Joel J |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In the current Canadian discussion of missile defence, it is often claimed that the future of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) is under threat and that it will be saved only if Canada opts in. The command does not need saving, however. Any such claim draws attention away from the real North American defence challenges that Canadians need to face in a debate about continental strategic defence: whether or not Canada needs to be protected by a missile defence system (a point that a Senate committee strongly emphasized in 2014) and what Ottawa needs to do about its own air defences that fall under NORAD. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Journal Vol. 70, No.2; Jun 2015: p.188-195 |
| Journal Source | International Journal Vol: 70 No 2 |
| Key Words | Missile Defence ; Air Defence ; Canada ; NORAD ; Continental Defence |