| ID | 138285 |
| Title Proper | NORAD conundrum |
| Other Title Information | Canada, missile defence, and military space |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Fergusson, James |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Concerns about the future of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) have forever dominated Canadian policy considerations regarding participation in the US missile defence program. Yet, fears that a Canadian decision not to participate could lead to the ‘‘demise’’ or marginalization of NORAD appear entirely unfounded in the wake of the formal Canadian refusal in 2005. This article identifies the reasons behind these fears relative to the nature and future of NORAD, and explains why they are both understandable and misplaced. Since the United States neither has, nor has ever had, a significant system requirement for Canadian participation, Washington has separated missile defence from the NORAD question. While this change in approach and legitimate concerns about NORAD’s marginalization have been managed through a Canadian military space contribution, it is likely that missile defence and military space cooperation will be managed on a bilateral basis largely outside of, and in support of, existing NORAD missions. This process reflects the reality of Canada–US North American defence cooperation, and NORAD’s limited place within it. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Journal Vol. 70, No.2; Jun 2015: p.196-214 |
| Journal Source | International Journal Vol: 70 No 2 |
| Key Words | Missile Defence ; Military Space ; NORAD ; Canada – United States Defence Cooperation ; Canadian Defence Policy |