Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1440Hits:18366155Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID138302
Title ProperAccountability in global governance
Other Title Informationcivil society claims for environmental performance at the world bank
LanguageENG
AuthorBuntaine, Mark T
Summary / Abstract (Note)International organizations frequently lack accountability to both states and civil society groups. States often face difficulties monitoring the actions of international organizations. Civil society groups do not often enjoy direct influence over decision-making within international organizations. To address these challenges, states have created accountability mechanisms for international organizations. Accountability mechanisms allow civil society groups to submit complaints about the performance of international organizations. They take the form of ombudsmen offices, accountability panels, and complaint procedures. Little is known about when and why these mechanisms constrain behavior by international organizations that runs counter to the mutual interests of states and civil society groups. Using the World Bank Inspection Panel as a test case, I show that monitoring by civil society groups alters lending at the World Bank when it enhances oversight by powerful states. By combining their abilities in sanctioning and monitoring, states and civil society groups can promote accountability at international organizations.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Studies Quarterly Vol. 59, No.1; Mar 2015: p.99-111
Journal SourceInternational Studies Quarterly Vol: 59 No 1
Key WordsCivil Society ;  International Organizations ;  World Bank ;  Global Governance ;  Environmental Performance ;  Accountability in Global Governance


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text