| ID | 138342 |
| Title Proper | Goodbye to all that (again)? the Fischer thesis, the new revisionism and the meaning of the first world war |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Rohl, John C G |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | What is the truth about the nature of the First World War and why have historians been unable to agree on its origins? The interpretation that no one country was to blame prevailed until the 1960s when a bitter international controversy, sparked by the work of the Hamburg historian Fritz Fischer, arrived at the consensus that the Great War had been a ‘bid for world power’ by imperial Germany and therefore a conflict in which Britain had necessarily and justly engaged. But in this centennial year Fischer's conclusions have in turn been challenged by historians claiming that Europe's leaders all ‘sleepwalked’ into the catastrophe. This article, the text of the Martin Wight Memorial Lecture held at the University of Sussex in November 2014, explores the archival discoveries which underpinned the Fischer thesis of the 1960s and subsequent research, and asks with what justification such evidence is now being set aside by the new revisionism. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Affairs Vol. 91, No.1; Jan 2015: p.153-166 |
| Journal Source | International Affairs Vol: 91 No 1 |
| Key Words | World Power ; First World War ; International Controversy ; Fischer Thesis ; Fritz Fischer Theory |