ID | 138770 |
Title Proper | American engagement and the pathways to Arab–Israeli peace |
Language | ENG |
Author | Pressman, Jeremy |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | This close empirical study of decades of US efforts to bring peace between Arab states and Israel helps reflect on Arild Underdal and Oran R. Young’s leadership typologies. Distinguishing between coercive leadership based on the incentives and sanctions that robust capabilities make possible and instrumental leadership focused more on talking, skilled mediation, and policy innovation is useful. However, this US mediation demonstrates that the two are not wholly distinct as previously suggested. The narrative of US efforts from Richard M Nixon to William J Clinton, including 22 cases of US involvement in Arab–Israeli mediation, suggests successful US mediation has been based on four factors. US involvement has led to breakthroughs when the US administration was highly engaged and kept at the problem after an initial diplomatic setback; benefitted from an exogenous event; managed that event to the US advantage; and dealt with strong Arab and Israeli partners. |
`In' analytical Note | Cooperation and Conflict Vol. 49, No.4; Dec 2014: p.536–553 |
Journal Source | Cooperation and Conflict 2014-12 49, 4 |
Key Words | Leadership ; United States ; Peace Process ; Mediation ; Arab – Israeli ; Foreign Policy |