Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1764Hits:19174417Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID138770
Title ProperAmerican engagement and the pathways to Arab–Israeli peace
LanguageENG
AuthorPressman, Jeremy
Summary / Abstract (Note)This close empirical study of decades of US efforts to bring peace between Arab states and Israel helps reflect on Arild Underdal and Oran R. Young’s leadership typologies. Distinguishing between coercive leadership based on the incentives and sanctions that robust capabilities make possible and instrumental leadership focused more on talking, skilled mediation, and policy innovation is useful. However, this US mediation demonstrates that the two are not wholly distinct as previously suggested. The narrative of US efforts from Richard M Nixon to William J Clinton, including 22 cases of US involvement in Arab–Israeli mediation, suggests successful US mediation has been based on four factors. US involvement has led to breakthroughs when the US administration was highly engaged and kept at the problem after an initial diplomatic setback; benefitted from an exogenous event; managed that event to the US advantage; and dealt with strong Arab and Israeli partners.
`In' analytical NoteCooperation and Conflict Vol. 49, No.4; Dec 2014: p.536–553
Journal SourceCooperation and Conflict 2014-12 49, 4
Key WordsLeadership ;  United States ;  Peace Process ;  Mediation ;  Arab – Israeli ;  Foreign Policy