ID | 138785 |
Title Proper | To repress or not to repress—regime survival strategies in the Arab Spring |
Language | ENG |
Author | Josua, Maria |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | Authoritarian regimes use repression as an essential strategy to attain regime stability and survival. During the Arab Spring, different forms of repression have been employed. We argue that to explain this variation, three bundles of characteristics have to be taken into account: the setup of the regime, the state, and the challenge. As we assume that elites have a wider repertoire of strategies besides repression at their disposal, the analysis of repression has to be embedded in a broader framework of strategies of rule. Including specific forms and target groups of repression, we develop an explanatory model addressing the question of which repressive measures rulers utilize under which circumstances. The postulated relationship between repression and characteristics of the state, regime, and challenge are then tested in a comparative analysis of the reactions to the challenges arising with the 2011 uprisings in two very different Arab countries, Bahrain and Egypt. On the basis of these empirical findings, we propose a readjusted model explaining repression. |
`In' analytical Note | Terrorism and Political Violence Vol. 27, No.2; Apr/Jun 2015: p.289-309 |
Journal Source | Terrorism and Political Violence Vol: 27 No 2 |
Key Words | Military ; Repression ; Arab World ; Protests ; Authoritarian Rule |