| ID | 138888 |
| Title Proper | Lords reform |
| Other Title Information | some inconvenient truths |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Farrington, Conor |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The failure of the Coalition government's attempt to reform the House of Lords has by no means taken further reform off the political agenda. The commitment to installing an elected upper chamber is still widely shared across the political spectrum, on the basis of perceptions that the House of Lords lacks democratic legitimacy. Against this view, this article considers recent literature upon non-electoral representation, deliberative democracy and bicameralism, which together highlight the possibility of an unelected second chamber playing a legitimate role within a wider (democratic) system of government. The article then considers the House of Lords from this perspective, reflecting on changes in the upper chamber since the 1999 reforms and evaluating its role within the wider political system. The paper concludes by suggesting that political debate should focus upon small-scale reforms to ensure that the Lords becomes more effective, representative and legitimate, within the constraints of its present role. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Quarterly Vol. 86, No.2; Apr/Jun 2015: p.297–306 |
| Journal Source | Political Quarterly 2015-06 86, 2 |
| Key Words | British Politics ; Constitutional Reform ; House of Commons ; House of Lords |