ID | 138904 |
Title Proper | Coercing climate action |
Language | ENG |
Author | Gilley, Bruce ; Kinsella, David |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | At UN-sponsored climate talks in 2013, the Group of 77 (G77) developing countries, joined by China, walked out briefly in protest against the failure of rich countries to provide a ‘loss-and-damage mechanism’ that would compensate poor countries for the detrimental effects of climate change. At the same conference, Japan’s announcement that it would not meet its emissions goals brought widespread condemnation. These events reflected an intensification of the most persistent deadlock in climate negotiations since the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) was agreed in 1992. |
`In' analytical Note | Survival : the IISS Quarterly Vol. 57, No.2; Apr/May 2015: p.7–28 |
Journal Source | Surviva Vol: 57 No 2 |
Key Words | GATT ; Climate Change ; Un Security Council ; Climate Action ; UNFCCC ; UNEP ; IPCC ; Coercing Climate Action ; Climate Securitisation ; Moderate Coercion ; Low coercion |