| ID | 139209 |
| Title Proper | Combined arms warfare |
| Other Title Information | the Israeli experience in the 1973 Yom Kippur War |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Rodman, David |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Traditional combined arms warfare is premised on the assumption that a symmetrical mix of different kinds of units and weapons offers an army the best prospect of achieving optimal results on the battlefield. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has been accused by critics over the years of essentially abandoning the practice of traditional combined arms warfare before the 1973 Yom Kippur War in favor of a nontraditional (asymmetrical) variant that relied much too heavily on tanks and aircraft. While this criticism certainly has substantial merit, the IDF’s reverses in the early days of the war were not due solely to a lack of emphasis on traditional combined arms warfare, but rather also to a “perfect storm” of circumstances that obtained at the outset of hostilities. To its credit, the IDF learned rapidly from its prewar mistakes in force structure and war-fighting doctrine, reverting within days to a traditional approach to the practice of combined arms warfare, at least on the ground. Though not a battlefield panacea by any means, traditional combined arms warfare clearly contributed to the IDF’s eventual victory in the war. |
| `In' analytical Note | Defence Studies Vol.15, No.2; Jun.2015: p.161-174 |
| Journal Source | Defence Studies Vol: 15 No 2 |
| Key Words | Tanks ; Aircraft ; Combined Arms Warfare ; Yom Kippur War ; Antitank weapons ; Air Defense ; Israel Defense Forces – IDF ; Israel Air Force – IAF ; Arms Warfare |