| ID | 139425 |
| Title Proper | How (Not) to disappear completely |
| Other Title Information | pedagogical potential of research methods in international relations |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Mutlu , Can E |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The question of research methods, and their role in the field, is a major source of contention for IR scholars. We can, however, discuss method, methodology, and innovation without revising or revisiting old debates. Methods do not have to be divisive, or disciplining. A frank discussion of research design, methods, and methodological preferences is essential to innovation and reproducibility. This intervention is a call for increased transparency in IR research outputs; IR theorists should not erase their own footprints from their publications and openly admit and discuss failures as productive moments in research. The act of disappearing, which has become the norm in the name of professionalised publications, robs the field of the productive pedagogical potential of research methods. The true impact of research rests in its pedagogical potential. As researchers, our job is thus to find a sensitive balance between not determining the outcome of the research from the get-go by making it all about our preferences and opinions, but also not making the impact of our preferences and opinions disappear completely. Building on this premise, this intervention discusses the significant pedagogical potential of research methods, reproducibility and discussion of failures in International Relations. |
| `In' analytical Note | Millennium: Journal of International Studies Vol. 43, No.3; Jun 2015: p.931-941 |
| Journal Source | Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2015-06 43, 3 |
| Key Words | Pedagogy ; Research Methods ; Research Design ; Failure ; Reproducibility ; Scientific Method |