| ID | 139568 |
| Title Proper | Limits of hybridity and the crisis of liberal peace |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Nadarajah, Suthaharan ; Rampton, David |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Hybridity has emerged recently as a key response in International Relations and peace studies to the crisis of liberal peace. Attributing the failures of liberal peacebuilding to a lack of legitimacy deriving from uncompromising efforts to impose a rigid market democratic state model on diverse populations emerging from conflict, the hybrid peace approach locates the possibility of a ‘radical’, post-liberal, and emancipatory peace in the agency of the local and the everyday and ‘hybrid’ formations of international/liberal and local/non-liberal institutions, practices, and values. However, this article argues, hybrid peace, emerging as an attempt to resolve a problem of difference and alterity specific to the context in which the crisis of liberal peacebuilding manifests, is a problem-solving tool for the encompassment and folding into globalising liberal order of cultural, political, and social orders perceived as radically different and obstructionist to its expansion. Deployed at the very point this expansion is beset by resistance and crisis, hybrid peace reproduces the liberal peace's logics of inclusion and exclusion, and through a reconfiguration of the international interface with resistant ‘local’ orders, intensifies the governmental and biopolitical reach of liberal peace for their containment, transformation, and assimilation. |
| `In' analytical Note | Review of International Studies Vol. 41, No.1; Jan 2015: p.49-72 |
| Journal Source | Review of International Studies Vol: 41 No 1 |
| Key Words | Liberal Peacebuilding ; International Relations ; Limits of hybridity ; Liberal Peace Crisis ; Hybrid Peace Approach ; Globalising Liberal Order |