Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:360Hits:19957574Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID139590
Title ProperLegitimacy faultlines in international society
Other Title Informationthe responsibility to protect and prosecute after Libya
LanguageENG
AuthorRalph, Jason ;  Gallagher, Adrian
Summary / Abstract (Note)There is a perceived legitimacy deficit in contemporary international society. A symptom of this is the political contestation surrounding the 2011 Libyan crisis and its influence on the 2011–13 Syrian crisis. This involved criticism being levelled at the coalition led by the so-called Permanent-3 for the way they implemented the protection of civilians mandate, as well as for the referral of the Libyan situation to the International Criminal Court. How the P3 respond to these developments will be driven in part by how this ‘legitimacy fault line’ is interpreted. The purpose of this article is to first give an interpretation that is informed by the work of contemporary English School scholars and the political theorists they draw on; and second to provide the context in which specific policy recommendations may guide the response of the P3 states. We argue that because the new legitimacy fault line divides on the procedural question of who decides how international society should meet its responsibilities rather than substantive disagreements about what those responsibilities are (that is, human protection and justice) the challenge to the liberal agenda of the P3 is not radical. However, we also argue that ignoring the procedural concerns of the African and BRICS states is not outcome neutral and could in fact do harm to both the ICC and the wider implementation of R2P. We consider two proposals for procedural reform and examine how the P3 response would impact on their claim to be good international citizens.
`In' analytical NoteReview of International Studies Vol. 41, No.3; Jul 2015: p.553-573
Journal SourceReview of International Studies Vol: 41 No 3
Key WordsLibya ;  International Society ;  Responsibility to Protect ;  R2P ;  Legitimacy Deficit ;  Libyan Crisis ;  Legitimacy Faultlines ;  Contemporary International Society ;  Procedural Reform


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text