Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:340Hits:19950132Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID139770
Title ProperBorder politics, right to life and acts of dissensus
Other Title Informationvoices from the Lampedusa borderland
LanguageENG
AuthorPuggioni, Raffaela
Summary / Abstract (Note)The debate on migration-related border controls has greatly expanded during the past decade. Special attention has been given to processes of contestation and of rights-claims enacted by migrants, drawing greatly on Isin’s work on acts of citizenship and Rancière’s articulation of the ‘uncounted’ and the political. Within this broad debate little attention has been devoted to the acts of common people in contesting current border management and especially in refusing the policing and the bordering of their own territory. By focusing on the Lampedusa borderland, this paper will explore and interrogate the verbal protests made by the people of Lampedusa in response to the drowning of some 366 African migrants on 3 October 2013. The protests were mostly against current border patrolling and its politics of (non-)life, which prioritise border protection against (migrants’) life protection. The call to protecting all human life, equally worthy of being protected, transformed these protests into political acts. Using and extending the work of Rancière, I explore the extent to which the people of Lampedusa have highlighted a ‘wrong’ and enacted ‘dissensus’ by contesting the (natural) securitised order of EU border management.
`In' analytical NoteThird World Quarterly Vol. 36, No.6; 2015: p.1145-1159
Journal SourceThird World Quarterly Vol: 36 No 6
Key WordsRight to Life ;  Ranciere ;  Dissensus ;  EU Border Politics ;  Lampedusa


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text