| ID | 140287 |
| Title Proper | National interest or transnational alliances? Japanese policy on the comfort women issue |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Ku, Yangmo |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | When and why does a perpetrator state take a contrite stance on its past wrongs? More specifically, why do Japanese behaviors differ over time in addressing apology and compensation with regard to the comfort women issue? In this article I address these questions by testing two hypotheses, utilizing an instrumentalist approach and a transnational-political activism model. The former posits a perpetrator state is more likely to take a contrite stance on its past misdeeds when it calculates such action is in its security and/or economic interests. The latter hypothesizes that when transnational activism is powerful and a perpetrator state is led by a progressive ruling coalition, the state is more likely to adopt conciliatory policies toward historical issues. I find that the transnational-political activism model possesses more explanatory power than instrumentalism for within-case variations in Japanese behavior toward the comfort women issue. The two approaches are not, however, mutually exclusive and are complementary in some regards. The effect of transnational activism is heightened when the target state is faced with other geopolitical incentives and/or when the target state is led by a progressive ruling coalition and has weak conservative reaction. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of East Asian Studies Vol. 15, No.2; May/Aug 2015: p.243-269 |
| Journal Source | Journal of East Asian Studies Vol: 15 No 2 |
| Key Words | Comfort Women ; Instrumentalism ; Transnational - Political Activism Model ; Apology and Compensation ; Postwar Japanese History Policy |