| ID | 140414 |
| Title Proper | Between doctrine and practice |
| Other Title Information | the UN peacekeeping dilemma |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Peter, Mateja |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Mandates of recent peacekeeping operations across Africa have shown substantial innovation in the thinking of the UN Security Council. Offensive use of force, use of unmanned aerial vehicles, strategic intelligence and communication, and state-building mandates in the midst of conflicts have all expanded the scope of activities beyond what the UN peacekeepers are accustomed to. The UN is entering a new era of enforcement peacekeeping. Enforcement peacekeeping manifests itself both in enforcement of political solutions through support of a government's state-building ambitions and its attempts to extend state authority in the midst of conflict and in enforcement of military victories through the offensive use of force. These developments further unsettle the basic principles of UN peacekeeping—consent, impartiality, and nonuse of force—resulting in a schism between the doctrine and practice. This contribution argues that such fundamental challenges, when not properly acknowledged, create a wall between operational activities and strategic considerations. They preclude a proper debate on the problematic externalities, in particular on political processes and peacebuilding. |
| `In' analytical Note | Global Governance Vol. 21, No.3; Jul/Sep 2015: p.351-370 |
| Journal Source | Global Governance Vol: 21 No 3 |
| Key Words | Peacekeeping ; Somalia ; African Union ; Peacebuilding ; Peace Enforcement ; Mali ; DRC ; United Nations ; Enforcement Peacekeeping |