| ID | 140525 |
| Title Proper | Obama and the Middle East |
| Other Title Information | rightsizing the U.S. role |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Lynch, Marc |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Critics of U.S. President Barack Obama’s Middle East strategy often complain that Obama lacks a strategic vision. This is almost exactly wrong. Obama came to office with a conviction that reducing the United States’ massive military and political investment in the Middle East was a vital national security interest in its own right. The occupation of Iraq and the excesses of the war on terrorism had left the United States overextended, especially at a time of economic crisis. “Rightsizing” the United States’ footprint in the region meant not only reducing its material presence but also exercising restraint diplomatically, stepping back and challenging allies to take greater responsibility for their own security. Obama has adhered consistently to this strategy, prioritizing it ruthlessly along the way and firmly resisting efforts to force it off track. This was not a strategy much beloved in Washington or in a region hard-wired for the exercise of American power. But it was a clear and coherent strategy that led Obama to undertake major initiatives on the problems he viewed as rising to the level of core national security interests: Iran’s nuclear weapons program, terrorism, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the war in Iraq. |
| `In' analytical Note | Foreign Affairs Vol. 94, No.5; Sep/Oct 2015: p.18-27 |
| Journal Source | Foreign Affairs Vol: 94 No 5 |
| Key Words | Middle East ; Obama ; US Role ; US Troops ; P5+1 ; US Guidance |