Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:362Hits:19885046Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID140773
Title ProperEconomic statecraft, structural power, and structural violence in Sino-Kyrgyz relations
LanguageENG
AuthorReeves, Jeffrey
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article employs the concepts of structural power and structural violence to a undertake critical study of China’s use of economic statecraft toward Kyrgyzstan. The article argues that China’s reliance on economic exchange to secure its strategic ends in Kyrgyzstan has resulted in asymmetric economic exchange between the two states. Through this asymmetric exchange, China has gained influence over Kyrgyzstan’s domestic structures. Chinese structural power, in turn, contributes to violence across Kyrgyzstan’s structures of economy, environment, and society and within the country’s state-society relations. Structural violence within Kyrgyzstan also results in periphery instability and domestic insecurity for China. As such, the article argues that China’s use of economic statecraft to achieve its strategic aims in Kyrgyzstan is self-defeating.
`In' analytical NoteAsian Security Vol. 11, No.2; May/Aug 2015: p.116-135
Journal SourceAsian Security Vol: 11 No 2
Key WordsEconomic Statecraft ;  Structural Violence ;  Structural Power ;  Sino-Kyrgyz Relations


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text