| ID | 140857 |
| Title Proper | PCC elections as a ‘failed experiment’ |
| Other Title Information | what lessons can be learned? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Kirkland, Christopher |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The low turnout of the 2012 police and crime commissioner (PCC) elections have led to questions surrounding their legitimacy and have even led to the former Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg describing the elections—elections his party helped to introduce—as a ‘failed experiment’. Despite this, the election of a majority Conservative government in May 2015 appears to offer some longevity to the role of police and crime commissioners and cements next year's PCC elections in the political diary. Concerns in the immediate aftermath of the elections focused upon the costs of the elections. In this article I offer some suggestions as to what lessons could be learned from this experiment and, through exploring the attitudes of voters, political parties and the media, suggest that we can learn four lessons: (1) that spoilt ballots cannot be ignored; that (2) political parties and (3) the media's attitudes toward elections are important in encouraging people to vote; and (4) that high numbers of independent candidates cannot simply be welcomed at times of elections. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Quarterly Vol. 86, No.3; Jul/Sep 2015: p.403–410 |
| Journal Source | Political Quarterly 2015-09 86, 3 |
| Key Words | Elections ; Turnout ; Independent Candidates ; Police and Crime commissioner ; Spoilt Ballots |