| ID | 141230 |
| Title Proper | Land grievances and the mobilization of electoral violence |
| Other Title Information | evidence from Côte d’Ivoire and Kenya |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Klaus, Kathleen ; Mitchell, Matthew I |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Recent studies have asked why elites resort to violence, yet many overlook the process and dynamics of mobilizing violence. How do politicians convince their supporters to fight? This article argues that in multi-ethnic and democratizing societies where land and property rights are weak and politicized, land grievances can provide leaders with a powerful tool to organize electoral violence. We develop a theory to show how land grievances can give rise to violent mobilization when leaders frame elections as a threat to the land security of supporters or an opportunity to reclaim land or strengthen land rights. Conversely, land grievances are ineffective when citizens do not believe that elections signal a credible threat to their land security or an opportunity to strengthen land rights. We further specify how the type of land grievance shapes the logic and form of violent action. Grievances based on land insecurity shape a pre-emptive logic of violence, while grievances based on competing land claims often shape an opportunistic logic of electoral violence. The article examines the validity of our theory using a comparative case study between zones of escalation and non-escalation of violence during post-electoral crises in Kenya (2007–08) and Côte d’Ivoire (2010–11). By observing the variation between positive and negative cases, the article identifies factors that foment and constrain the mobilization of election violence. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Peace Research Vol. 52, No.5; Sep 2015: p.622-635 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Peace Research Vol: 52 No 5 |
| Key Words | Africa ; Kenya ; Land ; Electoral Violence ; Grievances ; Côte D’Ivoire |