| ID | 141278 |
| Title Proper | Carl Schmitt in the Kremlin |
| Other Title Information | the Ukraine crisis and the return of geopolitics |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Auer, Stefan ; STEFAN AUER |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The protracted crisis in Ukraine has exposed fundamental political differences between leaders in western Europe and their counterparts in Russia. The very existence of the European Union was meant to have refuted geopolitics as a useful theoretical lens through which to view power relations in Europe. After all, the European project is based on the idea that boundaries no longer matter and that national sovereignty is obsolete. And yet, geopolitics remains critically important—certainly for Europe's potential enemies, but also for Europe itself. It is poignant that to advance our understanding of this new constellation we are well served to turn to the insights of a classic, if hugely controversial, German political thinker: Carl Schmitt. Schmitt's political philosophy is relevant in three aspects. First, as a source of inspiration—even if only indirectly—for the contemporary Russian political establishment. Second, the behaviour of Putin's Russia, particularly since 2008, can be best understood through some of the key concepts that preoccupied Schmitt: sovereignty, the political and geopolitics. Third, Schmitt's philosophy can serve as a point of departure for reflecting on the possibility of a more robust response by Europe to the Russian intervention in Ukraine. What Europe needs is a more hard-nosed realist approach, which recognizes that Russia's expansionist ambitions can only be constrained by its own readiness and willingness to deploy power both politically and, if necessary, even militarily. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Affairs Vol. 91, No.5; Sep 2015: p.953–968 |
| Journal Source | International Affairs Vol: 91 No 5 |
| Key Words | Western Europe ; Political Philosophy ; Carl Schmitt ; Ukraine Crisis ; Russian Intervention ; Return of Geopolitics ; The Kremlin ; Fundamental Political Differences |