Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:709Hits:20004156Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID141457
Title ProperRepresentation without taxation
Other Title Information political changes in Chinese authoritarian regimes
LanguageENG
AuthorYe, Jing
Summary / Abstract (Note)The question of why some authoritarian regimes choose to incorporate institutions of democracy such as village elections into their governing systems remains largely unanswered. As a typical case of a resilient authoritarian state that implements democracy in its villages, China has provided an invaluable case for researchers to study. Current theories focus on the influence of political elites and rural forces separately. Insightful as they are, these theories are invalid as an explanation of the variation of local governance in China across time and thus are incomplete. It should be recognized that central fiscal strategies have great effects on local governance. Specifically, if the central government largely relies upon fiscal revenue from rural areas, it has to expand its bureaucracy to the countryside to extract revenue. In contrast, if it does not rely on the rural areas for revenue, the central government will establish local democracy in the countryside. This hypothesis is historically reflected in the authoritarian regimes led by the Nationalist Party (KMT) and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in China. As opposed to the familiar story about representation through taxation, the logic of representation without taxation seems to be the case in China.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Contemporary China Vol. 24, No.96; Nov 2015: p.1111-1127
Journal SourceJournal of Contemporary China Vol: 24 No 96
Key WordsTaxation ;  Political Elites ;  Political Changes ;  Chinese Authoritarian Regimes ;  Institutions of Democracy ;  Rural Forces ;  Central Fiscal Strategies


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text