| ID | 141485 |
| Title Proper | Achieving accountability in climate negotiations |
| Other Title Information | past practices and implications for the post-2020 agreement |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | KONG Xiangwen ; Xiangwen, Kong |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | As negotiations for the post-2020 agreement on climate change are underway and expected to be concluded by the end of 2015, the call for ensuring accountability with respect to the implementation of the agreement is attracting increased attention. Hence, one need to have a clear understanding of the meaning of the term “accountability”, particularly as it is used in relation to climate change. Accountability, a term used frequently in politics, is rather new in international law. This paper examines the history of achieving accountability in climate change negotiations, and examines that history under three headings, namely, (1) accountability for historical emissions of developed countries, (2) accountability under the Convention and (3) accountability under the Kyoto Protocol. Through a reflection on past accountability practices, this paper intends to establish that two different modes for achieving accountability have emerged: (1) international legal accountability, and (2) international political accountability. These may well provide useful guides to those involved in crafting the post-2020 agreement. As past practice in climate negotiation has shown, achieving accountability has been fraught with difficulties due to its implications for sanctions or political pressures on a sovereign State. These same concerns would persist in the discussion of the accountability regime for the post-2020 agreement. |
| `In' analytical Note | Chinese Journal of International Law Vol. 14, No.3; Sep 2015: p.545-565 |
| Journal Source | Chinese Journal of International Law Vol: 14 No 3 |
| Key Words | Climate Change ; Climate Negotiations ; Achieving Accountability ; Past Practices and Implications ; Post-2020 Agreement |