Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1450Hits:19711800Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID141713
Title ProperWeak third parties and ripening
Other Title Informationrevisiting norwegian interventions in guatemala and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
LanguageENG
AuthorWaage, Hilde Henriksen ;  Nissen, Ada
Summary / Abstract (Note)Can weak third parties contribute to ripening conflicts for resolution despite their lack of leverage? According to the core principles of ripeness theory, mediators with leverage have a clear advantage when it comes to ripening. What is often overlooked in the literature, however, is the important ways a weak mediator can contribute to ripening as well. This article explores two noteworthy cases of weak third party ripening – the Norwegian roles in the Oslo channel between Israel and the Palestinians, and between the URNGguerrilla and the government in Guatemala. These cases demonstrate how careful interventions by weak third parties can help disputants see negotiations as a way out both in preliminary and later phases of negotiations. However, we also argue that weak third parties should not get involved in ripening unless they can call on a mediator with more leverage once substantial negotiations begin.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Negotiation Vol. 20, No.3; 2015: p.389-413
Journal SourceInternational Negotiation Vol: 20 No 3
Key WordsIsrael ;  Norway ;  Guatemala ;  Ripeness ;  Palestinian ;  Leverage ;  Power Asymmetry ;  Back Channels


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text