Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:389Hits:21109124Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID141714
Title ProperSoft power, bias and manipulation of international organizations in international mediation
LanguageENG
AuthorVukovic, Sinisa ;  Vukovic, SiniĊĦa
Summary / Abstract (Note)The present study challenges three common assumptions of the international mediation literature. First, it challenges the perception that pure or weak mediators are unable to use manipulative and coercive strategies in the mediation process, but can only resort to facilitating the dialogue and at most formulating a proposal on behalf of the disputants. Secondly, it challenges the perception that only resource-based power can be used to manipulate the process and coerce (and direct) the parties toward mutually acceptable solutions. This misconception is based on the assumption that the expansion of the zone of possible agreement, which is mainly attributed to manipulative strategies, can be achieved only by the employment of carrots and sticks which are often inaccessible to pure or weak mediators. Lastly, it shows how this type of leverage can also indicate a particular bias that an apparent pure mediator might have: bias of outcome.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Negotiation Vol. 20, No.3; 2015: p.414-443
Journal SourceInternational Negotiation Vol: 20 No 3
Key WordsEuropean Union ;  Power ;  Montenegro ;  Mediation ;  Soft Power ;  Strategies ;  International And Regional Organizations


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text