Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:791Hits:20022008Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID142260
Title ProperOne piece at a time
Other Title Informationwhy linear planning and institutionalisms promote military campaign failures
LanguageENG
AuthorZweibelson, Ben
Summary / Abstract (Note)The recent strategic failures in Iraq and Afghanistan for military coalitions illustrate that we have significant problems with understanding how and why we plan military campaigns in ways that over time demonstrate ineffectiveness and confusion. Arguably, we may not realize why we construct insufficient campaign plans because we are not even aware of our cognitive behaviors. This article critically charges that our entire approach to understanding conflict and our subsequent military planning methodologies stem from highly limited yet deeply cherished conceptual models that operate behind the scenes. We hardly realize them, yet they dominate our very understanding of how we imagine the world functions. With military campaign plans, our centralized hierarchies, linear causality reasoning, and other significant sociological forces send us into cycles of poor planning along with institutional blinders that resist critical reflection on why we are failing.
`In' analytical NoteDefence Studies Vol. 15, No.4; Dec 2015: p.360-374
Journal SourceDefence Studies Vol: 15 No 4
Key WordsPhilosophy ;  Military Sociology ;  Military Leadership ;  Organizational Theory ;  Strategy ;  Campaign Planning


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text