Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1282Hits:19525471Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID142484
Title ProperEuropean Union as a mediator in constitutional reform negotiations in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Other Title Informationthe failure of conditionality in the context of intransigent local politics
LanguageENG
AuthorTolksdorf, Dominik
Summary / Abstract (Note)The complex constitutional system in Bosnia and Herzegovina, intended to ensure power sharing between the three main ethnic groups, is characterized by a variety of veto rights in the legislative process. Not only has this system prevented swift decision making but it also discriminates parts of Bosnian society that do not belong to one of the three constituent peoples. The European Union, alongside other organizations, has for years called for these shortcomings to be addressed but has failed in its efforts to bring the intransigent Bosnian policy makers to agree on a compromise and to end the political stalemate in the country. The EU's activities to support constitutional reform were themselves ill fated. By introducing three criteria to systematically analyze the EU's policies, the article illustrates that the EU, after initial reluctance to become seriously engaged as a mediator in the reform negotiations, applied its conditionality inconsistently.
`In' analytical NoteNationalism and Ethnic Politics Vol. 21, No.4; Oct-Dec 2015: p.401-421
Journal SourceNationalism and Ethnic Politics Vol: 21 No 4
Key WordsBosnia and Herzegovina ;  Local Politics ;  European Unio ;  Constitutional Reform Negotiations ;  Intransigent


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text