| ID | 142537 |
| Title Proper | Method or madness? sociolatry in international thought |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Owens, Patricia |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | International theory has a social problem. Twenty years after the so-called ‘social turn’, the historical origins of distinctly social forms of thought are not subject to scrutiny, let alone well understood. Indeed, the problem of the ahistorical social is an issue not only for predominant liberal, realist, and constructivist appropriations of social theory, but also the broad spectrum of critical and Marxist modes of theorising. In contrast to practicing sociolatry, the worship of things ‘socio’, this article addresses the historicity of the social as both a mode of thought – primarily in social theories and sociology – against the background of the emergence of the social realm as a concrete historical formation. It highlights problems with the social theoretic underpinnings of liberalism, social constructivism, and Marxism and advances an original claim for why the rise of the social was accompanied by attacks on things understood (often erroneously) as political. To fully understand these phenomena demands a closer examination of the more fundamental governance form the modern social realm was purported to replace, but which it scaled up and transformed. |
| `In' analytical Note | Review of International Studies Vol. 41, No.4; Oct 2015: p.655-674 |
| Journal Source | Review of International Studies Vol: 41 No 4 |
| Key Words | Social Problem ; International Thought ; Sociolatry |