| ID | 142738 |
| Title Proper | Deliberative agenda setting |
| Other Title Information | piloting reform of direct democracy in California |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Kousser, Thad ; Fishkin, James ; Luskin, Robert C ; Siu, Alice |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Can the people deliberate to set the agenda for direct democracy in large scale states? How might such an institution work? The 2011 California Deliberative Poll piloted a solution to this problem helping to produce proposals that went to the ballot and also to the legislature. The paper reports on how this pilot worked and what it suggests about a possible institution to solve the deliberative agenda setting problem. The legislative proposal passed the legislature but the ballot proposition (Prop 31) failed. However, we show that the proposals actually deliberated on by the people might well have passed if not encumbered by additional elements not deliberated on by the public that drew opposition. The paper ends with an outline of how the process of deliberative agenda setting for the initiative might work, vetting proposals once every two years that could get on the ballot for a greatly reduced cost in signature collections. Adding deliberation to the agenda setting process would allow for a thoughtful and informed public will formation to determine the agenda for direct democracy. |
| `In' analytical Note | Perspectives on Politics Vol. 13, No.4; Dec 2015: p.1030-1042 |
| Journal Source | Perspectives on Politics 2015-12 13, 4 |
| Key Words | California ; Direct Democracy ; Agenda Settin ; Piloting Reform |