| ID | 142786 |
| Title Proper | Deterrence and arms control in a second conventional age |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Leah, Christine M |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Neither further nuclear reductions nor total nuclear disarmament are necessarily smart ideas, but proponents of these goals insist that we should move toward a second conventional age, in which nuclear weapons are either marginalized or completely removed from international politics. But in this world, deterrence and extended deterrence might not endure without boosting aspects of conventional arsenals. How might the U.S. deter adversaries and assure allies? The answer ultimately rests on conventional forces, especially long-range ballistic and cruise missiles. But these would have to be deployed in greater numbers to compensate for a “nuclear gap.” This might lead to a destabilizing arms race. |
| `In' analytical Note | Comparative Strategy Vol. 34, No.5; Nov-Dec 2015: p.401-421 |
| Journal Source | Comparative Strategy Vol: 34 No 5 |
| Key Words | Arms Control ; Deterrence ; Arms Race ; Nuclear Reductions ; Second Conventional Age ; Nuclear Gap |