| ID | 142982 |
| Title Proper | Hiroshima and the historians |
| Other Title Information | history as relative truth |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Pyle, Kenneth B |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | As is clear from the historiography of the US decision to use the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, the judgments of historians are relative to the time, place, and perspective from which they are writing. There are four major schools of historical interpretation of the decision. First is the orthodox view that was offered by the participants in the decision. Second is the revisionist view of historians writing during the era of the Vietnam war who adopted a much more critical interpretation. Third is an interpretive school that gives weight to the Japanese role and responsibility. Finally, the author's view is found in a more long-range perspective that finds the momentum created by President Roosevelt's unconditional surrender policy as the decisive factor. This policy provoked unconditional resistance in the Japanese military. By 1945 the legacy of Roosevelt's policy was firmly embedded in American public opinion. Historians have reached no consensus among these different interpretive schools. |
| `In' analytical Note | Asia Pacific Review Vol. 22, No.2; Nov 2015: p.14-27 |
| Journal Source | Asia Pacific Review Vol: 22 No 2 |
| Key Words | Atomic Bomb ; Japan ; Hiroshima ; Japanese Military ; Historians ; History as Relative Truth ; US Decision |