| ID | 143301 |
| Title Proper | Russia and strategic conventional weapons |
| Other Title Information | concerns and responses |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Acton, James M |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Russian political leaders and military strategists are growing increasingly concerned about “strategic conventional weapons”—a broad category that appears to include all non-nuclear, high-precision, standoff weapons—and about long-range, hypersonic weapons, in particular. These concerns are complex and multifaceted (and, in some cases, contradictory), but chief among them are the beliefs that strategic conventional weapons could prove decisive in a major conflict and that Russia is lagging behind in their development. US programs to develop and acquire such weapons—namely, the Conventional Prompt Global Strike program—are of great concern to Russian strategists, who argue both that the United States seeks such weapons for potential use against Russia—its nuclear forces, in particular—and because strategic conventional weapons are more “usable” than nuclear weapons. Asymmetric responses by Russia include increased reliance on tactical nuclear weapons, efforts to enhance the survivability of its nuclear forces, and investments in air and missile defenses. There is also strong—but not completely conclusive evidence—that Russia is responding symmetrically by attempting to develop a long-range, conventionally armed boost-glide weapon. |
| `In' analytical Note | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 22, No.2; Jun 2015: p.141-154 |
| Journal Source | Nonproliferation ReviewVol: 22 No 2 |
| Key Words | conventional weapons ; Missiles ; Russia ; Strategic Stability ; Prompt Global Strike ; Boost-Glide Weapons |