Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:495Hits:20403982Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID143848
Title ProperRe-emerging powers and the impasse in the UNSC over R2P intervention in Syria
LanguageENG
AuthorOdeyemi, Christo
Summary / Abstract (Note)The article examines the influence of BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) members that acts as an important condition of success for implementation of the three-pillared Responsibility to Protect (R2P) principle in case of Syrian conflict. Analysis has revealed two distinctive features of the BRICS’s positions. Firstly, BRICS has placed particular emphasis on there being a reasonable prospect of success before supporting intervention. Secondly, BRICS’s opposition to military intervention arises perhaps not so much from the regime change issue in Libya as the reality that many of the draft resolutions sponsored by the United States–France–United Kingdom (P3) alliance accused President Bashar Assad’s regime of mass atrocity crimes without levying the same accusation against the rebels fighting the regime.
`In' analytical NoteStrategic Analysis Vol. 40, No.2; Mar-Apr 2016: p.122-149
Journal SourceStrategic Analysis Vol: 40 No 2
Key WordsMilitary Intervention ;  Syria ;  UNSC ;  R2P ;  BRICS ;  Re-emerging Powers ;  United States–France–United Kingdom


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text