| ID | 143900 |
| Title Proper | Rethinking ripeness theory |
| Other Title Information | explaining progress and failure in civil war negotiations in the Philippines and Colombia |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Walch, Colin |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | How can ripeness theory be extended to explain when and why parties remain at the negotiating table until an agreement is reached? Existing ripeness theory is crucial in understanding when conflicting parties consider negotiation as preferable to continued fighting. However, factors which may explain why parties stay at the negotiation table after the start of the negotiation process – that is, how the ripe moment is sustained until an agreement has been reached – are not well elaborated. This study seeks to extend ripeness theory and argues that organizationally fragmented rebel groups are less flexible to make concessions and unlikely to stay at the negotiation table until an agreement is reached, especially when there is a lack of cohesion between the military and political branches. This argument is explored through a structured focused comparison of the peace negotiations in Colombia and in the Philippines with communist rebel groups. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Negotiation Vol. 21, No.1; 2016: p.75-103 |
| Journal Source | International Negotiation Vol: 21 No 1 |
| Key Words | Philippines ; Colombia ; Rebel Group ; Fragmentation ; Cohesion ; Peace Negotiation ; Civil War ; Ripeness Theory |