| ID | 144290 |
| Title Proper | Strategic ambiguity |
| Other Title Information | nuclear sharing and the secret strategy for drafting articles i and ii of the nonproliferation treaty |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Khalessi, Daniel |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Since the 1950s, the United States has engaged in nuclear sharing with its NATO allies. Today, 150-200 tactical nuclear weapons remain on European soil. However, the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) prohibits the transfer of nuclear weapons to non-nuclear weapon states. The potential discrepancy between text and practice raises the question of how the NPT's negotiators dealt with NATO's nuclear-sharing arrangements while drafting the treaty that would eventually become the bedrock of the international nonproliferation regime. Using a multitiered analysis of secret negotiations within the White House National Security Council, NATO, and US-Soviet bilateral meetings, this article finds that NATO's nuclear-sharing arrangements strengthened the NPT in the short term by lowering West German incentives to build the bomb. However, this article also finds that decision makers and negotiators in the Lyndon B. Johnson administration had a coordinated strategy of deliberately inserting ambiguous language into drafts of Articles I and II of the Treaty to protect and preserve NATO's pre-existing nuclear-sharing arrangements in Europe. This diplomatic approach by the Johnson administration offers lessons for challenges concerning NATO and relations with Russia today. |
| `In' analytical Note | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 22, No.3-4; Sep-Dec 2015: p.421-439 |
| Journal Source | Nonproliferation ReviewVol: 22 No 3-4 |
| Key Words | NATO ; Deterrence ; United States ; Europe ; Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons ; Nuclear Sharing ; Soviet Union ; History ; Cold War |