| ID | 144292 |
| Title Proper | All together now? questioning WMDs as a useful analytical unit for understanding chemical and biological weapons proliferation |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Narang, Neil |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The popular use of the term “weapons of mass destruction” (WMD) can be understood to imply a relationship between nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons proliferation insofar as it assumes that the separate weapons technologies can be usefully grouped into a single analytic category. This article explores whether WMD is actually a useful construct. It begins by reviewing the literature on nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons proliferation, including a recent study that sought to estimate the relationship between the pursuit and acquisition of these different weapons. It then explores some policy inferences that academics and policy makers may be tempted to draw from these studies, particularly regarding the Barack Obama administration's pursuit of deep nuclear reductions. It argues that many of these policy inferences are premature at best and misleading at worst. It concludes with a call for additional research into the causes and consequences of chemical and biological weapons proliferation, and a call for scholars to remain cautious in their desire to draw premature policy implications from their studies in order to be “policy relevant.” |
| `In' analytical Note | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 22, No.3-4; Sep-Dec 2015: p.457-468 |
| Journal Source | Nonproliferation ReviewVol: 22 No 3-4 |
| Key Words | Nuclear Weapons ; Biological weapons ; Chemical Weapons ; Weapons of Mass Destruction ; Proliferation, Disarmament |