Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1456Hits:19406942Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID144533
Title ProperBalance or to bandwagon? adjusting to China's rise during Australia's Rudd–Gillard era
LanguageENG
AuthorBloomfield, Alan
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article examines Australian grand strategy in the context of China's rise during the period of Labor governments between 2007 and 2013. Australia's grand-strategic posture is treated as the dependent variable, plotted along a balancing-to-bandwagoning continuum. Australia remained within the hedging zone throughout, although there were discernible shifts in posture during the period. While momentum was building towards a more overt balancing posture during the Kevin Rudd era, the various balancing and bandwagoning ‘signals’ were more contradictory after Julia Gillard unseated Rudd 2010; in short, she stabilised Australia's grand-strategic posture, meaning it remains best characterized as ‘dominance denial’.
`In' analytical NotePacific Review Vol. 29, No.2; May 2016: p.259-282
Journal SourcePacific Review Vol: 29 No 2
Key WordsAustralia ;  Grand Strategy ;  China's Rise ;  Balancing and Bandwagoning