| ID | 144825 |
| Title Proper | Better Press |
| Other Title Information | a response to John Lloyd's ‘regulate yourself’ |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Cathcart, Brian |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Writing recently in The Political Quarterly, the journalist John Lloyd took issue with regulatory remedies for ‘bad journalism’ in the United Kingdom that were proposed by the Leveson inquiry of 2011–12 and endorsed by Parliament in 2013 in the form of a Royal Charter. State action will fail, he asserted, because only journalists can change journalism, and he urged British journalists to undertake this transformation. This response argues that Lloyd dismisses the Leveson process too lightly and takes too little account of the many victims of press abuses, who are entitled to better protection. A decent society had to do something about this, and the Leveson Charter process was a measured and constructive response that offers the best hope of higher press standards and of protection for ordinary citizens while safeguarding freedom of expression for journalists. Lloyd's proposal for action by journalists, by contrast, is impractical, not least because it ignores powerful forces preventing journalists from taking control. |
| `In' analytical Note | Political Quarterly Vol. 87, No.1; Jan-Mar 2016: p.6-11 |
| Journal Source | Political Quarterly 2016-03 87, 1 |
| Key Words | Journalism ; Freedom ; Regulation ; Charter ; Leveson |