Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:386Hits:19961165Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID144927
Title ProperSecurity versus liberty in the context of counterterrorism
Other Title Informationan experimental approach
LanguageENG
AuthorGeva, Nehemia ;  Garcia, Blake E
Summary / Abstract (Note)A critical question in counterterrorism studies concerns the extent to which governments adequately balance the continual provision of individual rights and freedoms with the appropriate level of national security when faced with a terrorist attack. We experimentally assess this tradeoff utilizing a 2 × 2 × 2 between-groups factorial design, manipulating (a) the extent of terror-related threats, (b) the level of invasiveness of subsequent counterterrorism policies, as well as (c) the terror context: transnational and domestic. The results provide evidence that the public is more willing to accept greater reductions in civil liberties under a greater threat of terrorism only when the perceived effectiveness of those policies to prevent future acts of terrorism is high. Furthermore, we find these results to be specific to the context of a transnational terror threat. This suggests that the public will be unwilling to accept reductions in civil liberties when the source of the attack is domestic, regardless of the level of threat or how effective subsequent policies may be in preventing future attacks.
`In' analytical NoteTerrorism and Political Violence Vol. 28, No.1-2; Apr-Jun 2016: p.30-48
Journal SourceTerrorism and Political Violence Vol: 28 No 1-2
Key WordsNational Security ;  Transnational Terrorism ;  Civil liberties ;  Domestic Terrorism ;  Counterterrorism Policy ;  Experimental Approach


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text