Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:963Hits:18441264Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID144932
Title ProperBattlefield outcomes and Rebel Cohesion
Other Title Information lessons from the Eritrean independence war
LanguageENG
AuthorWoldemariam, Michael
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article uses data from the Eritrean war for independence to refine existing theories of rebel fragmentation. The author argues organizational performance affects the emergence of factional infighting within rebel organizations in unique and novel ways. While battlefield losses increase the likelihood of internal fragmentation, so do battlefield gains. The implication is battlefield stalemates possess unique properties that promote organizational cohesion in war, a relationship this study refers to as “cohesive stalemates.” The article extends an emerging literature on the internal politics of insurgent groups that has linked the coherence of rebel organizations to rebel losses.
`In' analytical NoteTerrorism and Political Violence Vol. 28, No.1-2; Apr-Jun 2016: p.135-156
Journal SourceTerrorism and Political Violence Vol: 28 No 1-2
Key WordsInsurgency ;  Eritrea ;  Fragmentation ;  Factionalism ;  Rebel ;  Civil War ;  Battlefield Outcomes ;  Jebha


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text