Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:230Hits:20412751Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID145122
Title ProperNormative power in the EU and ASEAN
Other Title Informationwhy they diverge
LanguageENG
AuthorHe, Jiajie
Summary / Abstract (Note)The European Union (EU) and Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) aspire to two different types of normative roles in their foreign relations, which reflect the different contexts and goals of their socialization frameworks. The EU, which can collectively count itself as a contemporary great power, seeks a normative role aiming to engage smaller players, often with serious domestic problems. By contrast, ASEAN—essentially a group of relatively weak states—is located in an area where its own security depends on the competition between great powers. Although the EU employs its normative power primarily to shape the political preferences of its neighboring small states and thus construct a normative hegemon in the European periphery, ASEAN’s normative influence is more concerned about intervention by the great powers of Asia. Although the EU model has dominated the discourse of normative power, the normative practice of ASEAN may be more relevant to the developing world facing great powers or a regional hegemon.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Studies Review Vol. 18, No.1; Mar 2016: p.92-105
Journal SourceInternational Studies Review Vol: 18 No 1
Key WordsASEAN ;  EU ;  Normative Power ;  Regional Hegemon ;  Global IR


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text