| ID | 145124 |
| Title Proper | African agency in R2P |
| Other Title Information | Interventions by African Union and ECOWAS in Mali, Cote D’ivoire, and Libya |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Aning, Kwesi ; Edu-Afful, Fiifi |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Both the African Union (AU) and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) have been global leaders in embracing and operationalizing responsibility to protect (R2P). The adoption of the AU’s Constitutive Act, Article 4 (h) in 2000, has transformed its old-fashioned principle of noninterference to one of nonindifference. This authorizes the AU to intervene in Member States with respect to war crimes, genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity. ECOWAS has through its conflict prevention, management, and resolution protocol and its conflict prevention framework deepened and practicalized the notion of sovereignty as responsibility. These frameworks from both the AU and the ECOWAS have close similarities to the R2P norms. However, although these notions are captured in official documents, their actual operationalization faces challenges relating to sovereignty, limited institutional capacity, a restricted appetite for enforcement action, and a lack of explicit instruments to activate their intervention clauses in R2P-like situations. In spite of these challenges, the article argues that the initiatives of both the AU and the ECOWAS in Mali, Cote d’Ivoire, and Libya demonstrated a positively active African agency in contributing to global peace processes. This article, therefore, assesses the successes and limitations of African regional agency in enforcing R2P-like norms among its member states and its implications for and contributions to global international relations discourses. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Studies Review Vol. 18, No.1; Mar 2016: p.120-133 |
| Journal Source | International Studies Review Vol: 18 No 1 |
| Key Words | Libya ; African Union ; ECOWAS ; Mali ; R2P ; Cote D’Ivoire |