| ID | 145624 |
| Title Proper | Exclusionary and non-consensual transitions versus inclusive and consensual democratizations |
| Other Title Information | the cases of Egypt and Tunisia |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Szmolka, Inmaculada |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The article analyzes the democratic transitions in Tunisia and Egypt, after the so-called “Arab Spring.” The working hypothesis is that the model of transition influences the result of democratization processes. The article is organized in three sections. The first one puts forward a theoretical and methodological framework, which includes a definition and classification of political regimes, a typology of the processes of political change and suggests models of democratic transition. Second, the models of transition in Tunisia and Egypt are compared in terms of four analytical dimensions: leadership of the transition, competition and interaction between political actors, consensus over the transition process, and the popular mobilization and the participation of the civil society. The third section assesses the outcomes of the research and concludes that the exclusion of political forces and the intervention of non-accountable actors can determine the result of democratic transitions (Egypt). In contrast, the agreements between political actors and the concessions of a predominant party can bring about a successful transition, even in a polarized scenario (Tunisia). |
| `In' analytical Note | Arab Studies Quarterly Vol. 37, No.1; Winter 2015: p. 73-95 |
| Journal Source | Arab Studies Quarterly Vol: 37 No 1 |
| Key Words | Egypt ; Political Change ; Democratization ; Regime Change ; Political Regimes ; Tunisia ; Models of Democratic Transition ; Persistence of Authoritarianism |