| ID | 145821 |
| Title Proper | Party Structure, information, and coalition durability |
| Other Title Information | the relevance of NATO in the global war on terror |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Kattelman, Kyle T |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Using the test cases of Afghanistan and Iraq, this study illustrates how alliances work to mitigate the conflicting frames that party structure and media access provide in the Global War on Terror, which leads to more cohesiveness in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)–led coalition in Afghanistan as opposed to the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq. The approach utilized here extends the theory on alliance capability and uncertainty by arguing that alliances reduce uncertainty among member states on a strategic objective. This is particularly relevant when examining asymmetric, limited conflicts, where party structures and media access can work to disseminate conflicting frames to a domestic populace, who then can pressure their leader to withdraw from a coalition. The implications of these findings lend support to the continued relevance of NATO in the twenty-first-century security arena. |
| `In' analytical Note | Studies in Conflict and Terrorism Vol. 39, No.9; Sep 2016 : p.803-818 |
| Journal Source | Studies in Conflict and Terrorism Vol: 39 No 9 |
| Key Words | Information ; Global War ; Terror ; Party Structure ; Coalition Durability ; Relevance of NATO |