| ID | 145858 |
| Title Proper | Operations planning revisited |
| Other Title Information | theoretical and practical implications of methodology |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Erdeniz, Robert |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Parts of NATO’s contemporary planning framework called the comprehensive operations planning directive (COPD), and parts of the operation-level planning process should be revised since they suffer from methodological inconsistency. This claim is defended by discussing contradicting methodological properties and heuristics applied when framing and managing a military problem in accordance with the COPD. The methodological inconsistency within the COPD; in other words, simultaneously applying contradictory methodological properties, implies one theoretical and three practical implications. The theoretical implication is summarised in a meta-theoretical framework and explained by discussing five methodological properties: non-linearity, emergence, independently changeable generalisations, invariance and boundaries. The three practical implications of methodology imply that methodology is guiding: the problem-frame, conceptual development and action. To improve military planners’ understanding and management of these four identified implications, NATO is recommended to develop a “handbook of methodology.” The purpose of such a handbook should be to emphasise the utility of methodology when planning military operations. |
| `In' analytical Note | Defence Studies Vol. 16, No.3; Sep 2016: p.248-269 |
| Journal Source | Defence Studies Vol: 16 No 3 |
| Key Words | Methodology ; Complexity ; Operations Planning ; COPD ; Systemic Approach ; Causalist Approach |