| ID | 145974 |
| Title Proper | Virtualization of security |
| Other Title Information | philosophies of capture and resistance in Baudrillard, Agamben and Deleuze |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Lundborg, Tom |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | During the last couple of decades, the virtual has emerged as a forceful conceptual tool in security studies. While used primarily in order to question assumptions about an objective truth concerning the meaning and value of security and different forms of insecurity, the implications of drawing on this concept vary considerably depending on how the virtual is conceptualized, and specifically how the potentiality of the virtual is linked to the process of actualization. Turning to the philosophies of Baudrillard, Agamben and Deleuze, as well as key thinkers in contemporary security studies, this article delineates three different approaches to analysing the virtualization of security. Focusing in particular on how these approaches point to contending views of ‘capture’ and ‘resistance’, it is argued that the choice of approach has serious implications for grasping what is at stake politically in the process of virtualization. These implications relate, more precisely, to how the virtual opens up and/or closes down the spaces of resistance that the modern subject of security traditionally has relied upon. In this way, the virtualization of security not only is important for thinking about capture and resistance, but challenges the very ground on which the modern subject of security rests. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Dialogue Vol. 47, No.3; Jun 2016: p.255-270 |
| Journal Source | Security Dialogue Vol: 47 No 3 |
| Key Words | Security ; Deleuze ; Agamben ; Baudrillard ; Potentiality ; Virtual |