Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1447Hits:19694496Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID146236
Title ProperGraveyard of analogies
Other Title Informationthe use and abuse of history for the war in Afghanistan
LanguageENG
AuthorMiller, Paul D
Summary / Abstract (Note)Decades of scholarship have warned against using historical analogies for policymaking. But the Taliban insurgency appears, on the surface, to confirm the usefulness of historical analogies to the British and Soviet wars in Afghanistan. I review the use of analogies for the war in Afghanistan and argue the analogies were historically unsound and strategically unhelpful. In fact, their effect on policy helped create the conditions for the very insurgency policymakers most hoped to avoid. The Taliban insurgency did not occur because of the presence of too many foreign troops and aid workers, but because there were too few.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Strategic Studies Vol. 39, No.3; Jun 2016: p.446-476
Journal SourceJournal of Strategic Studies Vol: 39 No 3
Key WordsAfghanistan ;  Vietnam ;  Historical Analogies ;  Graveyard of Empires ;  Soviet–Afghan War ;  US Foreign Policy Process