Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1326Hits:19418103Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID146763
Title ProperAdministrative cohesion and anti-corruption reforms in Georgia and Ukraine
LanguageENG
AuthorNasuti, Peter
Summary / Abstract (Note)Previous studies of former communist countries have linked decentralisation of power to a greater likelihood of reform. An analysis of the anti-corruption drives in Georgia and Ukraine after their respective ‘colour revolutions’, however, suggests that Georgia’s greater centralisation was integral to its success in enacting anti-corruption measures. In explaining why this contradictory result happened, this article argues that a centralised government can be more effective at implementing reforms than a decentralised one as long as the background and preferences of the ruling administration are conducive to change.
`In' analytical NoteEurope-Asia Studies Vol. 68, No.5; Jul 2016: p.847-867
Journal SourceEurope-Asia Studies Vol: 68 No 5
Key WordsUkraine ;  Georgia ;  Administrative Cohesion ;  Anti-Corruption Reforms


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text