| ID | 146782 |
| Title Proper | Nakhchyvan, the Armenian arguments and the Allied powers in 1919 |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Imranli-Lowe, Kamala |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The article explores the territorial conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the Nakhchyvan region after the South Caucasus came under the Allied control following the Mudros Armistice of 30 October 1918. It analyses the arguments of the Armenian Government submitted to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 to substantiate its vision of territorial delimitation between the two republics with regard to Nakhchyvan, examines the positions of Azerbaijan and Armenia and the Allied Powers on the Nakhchyvan problem and assesses the impact of their stance on the settlement of the issue. It argues that the Armenian claims to the region were land-related, being part of the Armenian nationalist aim of constructing an expanded Armenia from the Mediterranean to Garabagh. It also argues that the Allied Powers were guided by their own interests while making proposals on the settlement of the conflict. |
| `In' analytical Note | Middle Eastern Studies Vol. 52, No.2; Mar 2016: p.295-317 |
| Journal Source | Middle Eastern Studies 2016-04 52, 2 |
| Key Words | Culture ; Politics ; Nakhchyvan ; Foreign Polic ; Armenian Arguments ; 1919 |